On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 03:54:35PM +0900, SeongJae Park wrote:
> Test for rcu_barrier() has introduced by commit fae4b54f28f0 ("rcu:
> Introduce rcutorture testing for rcu_barrier()"). Updated document says
> that `rtbe` field of output indicates failure of the test. However, the
> code has not updated as so. This commit updates the code to print out
> the field as document says.
>
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <[email protected]>
Good catch, queue!
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> index f0f32f8..ac29017 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> @@ -1259,8 +1259,9 @@ rcu_torture_stats_print(void)
> atomic_read(&n_rcu_torture_alloc),
> atomic_read(&n_rcu_torture_alloc_fail),
> atomic_read(&n_rcu_torture_free));
> - pr_cont("rtmbe: %d rtbke: %ld rtbre: %ld ",
> + pr_cont("rtmbe: %d rtbe: %ld rtbke: %ld rtbre: %ld ",
> atomic_read(&n_rcu_torture_mberror),
> + n_rcu_torture_barrier_error,
> n_rcu_torture_boost_ktrerror,
> n_rcu_torture_boost_rterror);
> pr_cont("rtbf: %ld rtb: %ld nt: %ld ",
> --
> 1.9.1
>
