I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]> --- drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stb0899_drv.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stb0899_drv.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stb0899_drv.c index 3d171b0..99de421 100644 --- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stb0899_drv.c +++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stb0899_drv.c @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ #define MAX_XFER_SIZE 64 static unsigned int verbose = 0;//1; -module_param(verbose, int, 0644); +module_param(verbose, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); /* C/N in dB/10, NIRM/NIRL */ static const struct stb0899_tab stb0899_cn_tab[] = { -- 2.9.2
