I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]> --- drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c b/drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c index 317ef63..21bb00c 100644 --- a/drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c +++ b/drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c @@ -44,11 +44,11 @@ #define XREG_ADC_ENV 0x0100 static int debug; -module_param(debug, int, 0644); +module_param(debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "enable verbose debug messages"); static int no_poweroff; -module_param(no_poweroff, int, 0644); +module_param(no_poweroff, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(no_poweroff, "0 (default) powers device off when not used.\n" "1 keep device energized and with tuner ready all the times.\n" " Faster, but consumes more power and keeps the device hotter\n"); -- 2.9.2
