I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]> --- drivers/media/pci/cx25821/cx25821-core.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/cx25821/cx25821-core.c b/drivers/media/pci/cx25821/cx25821-core.c index 0042803..49fffbc 100644 --- a/drivers/media/pci/cx25821/cx25821-core.c +++ b/drivers/media/pci/cx25821/cx25821-core.c @@ -34,11 +34,11 @@ MODULE_AUTHOR("Shu Lin - Hiep Huynh"); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); static unsigned int debug; -module_param(debug, int, 0644); +module_param(debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "enable debug messages"); static unsigned int card[] = {[0 ... (CX25821_MAXBOARDS - 1)] = UNSET }; -module_param_array(card, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(card, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(card, "card type"); const struct sram_channel cx25821_sram_channels[] = { -- 2.9.2
