On 31/07/16 21:34, Salah Triki wrote:
> node_off is unconditionally set to bt_super.root_node_ptr, so no need to
> init it to zero.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/befs/btree.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/befs/btree.c b/fs/befs/btree.c
> index f33fc6c..3cb97e8 100644
> --- a/fs/befs/btree.c
> +++ b/fs/befs/btree.c
> @@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ befs_btree_read(struct super_block *sb, const 
> befs_data_stream *ds,
>  {
>       struct befs_btree_node *this_node;
>       befs_btree_super bt_super;
> -     befs_off_t node_off = 0;
> +     befs_off_t node_off;
>       int cur_key;
>       fs64 *valarray;
>       char *keystart;
> 

Looks good to me.

Strange that static analysis didn't pick this one up before.

Acked-by: Luis de Bethencourt <[email protected]>

Pushed to the befs-next branch:
https://github.com/luisbg/linux-befs/tree/befs-next

Thanks Salah,
Luis

Reply via email to