On Thu 28-07-16 10:54:02, Jia He wrote:
> In powerpc servers with large memory(32TB), we watched several soft
> lockups for hugepage under stress tests.
> The call trace are as follows:
> 1.
> get_page_from_freelist+0x2d8/0xd50  
> __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x180/0xc20  
> alloc_fresh_huge_page+0xb0/0x190    
> set_max_huge_pages+0x164/0x3b0      
> 
> 2.
> prep_new_huge_page+0x5c/0x100             
> alloc_fresh_huge_page+0xc8/0x190          
> set_max_huge_pages+0x164/0x3b0
> 
> This patch is to fix such soft lockups. It is safe to call cond_resched() 
> there because it is out of spin_lock/unlock section.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jia He <[email protected]>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]>
> Cc: Mike Kravetz <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <[email protected]>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>

> 
> ---
> Changes in V2: move cond_resched to a common calling site in 
> set_max_huge_pages
> 
>  mm/hugetlb.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index abc1c5f..9284280 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -2216,6 +2216,10 @@ static unsigned long set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate 
> *h, unsigned long count,
>                * and reducing the surplus.
>                */
>               spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +
> +             /* yield cpu to avoid soft lockup */
> +             cond_resched();
> +
>               if (hstate_is_gigantic(h))
>                       ret = alloc_fresh_gigantic_page(h, nodes_allowed);
>               else
> -- 
> 2.5.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]";> [email protected] </a>

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Reply via email to