On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> wrote:
> The new simplified __pvclock_read_cycles does the same computation
> as vread_pvclock, except that (because it takes the pvclock_vcpu_time_info
> pointer) it has to be moved inside the loop.  Since the loop is expected to
> never roll, this makes no difference.

Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>

Reply via email to