On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 11:35:43AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 5 May 2016 11:32:51 -0400 > Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Think about it, what's the difference if the interrupt came in just > > before the trace or just after? It still came in the same location with > > respect to the normal flow of the code. The only difference is, where > > we recorded it. > > Also, if we used a temp buffer for each one, the same thing would > happen. The interrupt would be committed first before returning back to > the interrupted event. Perf does the same thing, but all the time.
yeah. good point. there is no actual 'order' here. The whole thing looks good to me. Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
