Mimi Zohar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Point to the public_key_signature struct from the pkcs7_signed_info struct > > rather than embedding it. This makes it easier to have it take an > > arbitrary number of MPIs in future. > > Just a reminder ... > > Reviewing patches isn't easy no matter how well written and documented, > especially large patch sets. For this reason, patch sets should be > limited to the patches that are required to accomplish the patch set > goal. In this case, that goal is to change "how certificates/keys are > determined to be trusted." > > Although this patch is straight forward, the patch description should > include a reason for including this patch in this patch set. Is having > an arbitrary number of MPIs included in this patch set? Could this > patch be deferred?
Actually, this may be changed with the advent of Tadeusz's patches. David
