Rudolf Polzer <[email protected]> wrote: > As for 24:xx:yy times - I'm split about this. This code doesn't > require a bijective decoding anyway (and if it did, 24:00:00 and > 00:00:00 mapping to the same time64_t would be problem enough) so this > is sure safe. On the other hand, a cert with a 24:xx:yy time that's > not 24:00:00 probably should be regarded as invalid and not trusted > for that reason alone.
Feel free to argue that one with Linus:-/ David
