On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Luck, Tony <[email protected]> wrote:
> You were heading towards:
>
> ld: undefined __mcsafe_copy

True, we'd also need a dummy mcsafe_copy() definition to compile it
out in the disabled case.

> since that is also inside the #ifdef.
>
> Weren't you going to "select" this?
>

I do select it, but by randconfig I still need to handle the
CONFIG_X86_MCE=n case.

> I'm seriously wondering whether the ifdef still makes sense. Now I don't have 
> an extra exception table and routines to sort/search/fixup, it doesn't seem 
> as useful as it was a few iterations ago.

Either way is ok with me.  That said, the extra definitions to allow
it compile out when not enabled don't seem too onerous.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to