On 12/24/2015 12:36 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Dongsheng Yang <[email protected]> writes:
[...]
Hi Eric,
Happy new year and sorry for the late reply.
Given the other constraints on an implementation the pid namespace looks
by far the one best suited to host such a sysctl if it is possible to
implement safely.
So you think it's better to isolate the core_pattern in pid_namespace,
am I right?
But, core_file_path and user_mode_helper_path in core_pattern are much
more related with mnt_namespace IMO.
Could you help to explain it more?
Thanx
Yang
Eric
.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
