On Fri, 4 Dec 2015, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 04/12/15 14:06, David Vrabel wrote:
> > On 03/12/15 10:43, David Vrabel wrote:
> >> Adding the rtc platform device when there are no legacy irqs (no
> >> legacy PIC) causes a conflict with other devices that end up using the
> >> same irq number.
> > 
> > An alternative is to remove the rtc_cmos platform device in Xen PV
> > guests.
> > 
> > Any preference on how this regression should be fixed?
> > 
> > David
> > 
> > 8<--------------------------
> > x86: Xen PV guests don't have the rtc_cmos platform device
> > 
> [...]
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
> > @@ -200,6 +200,9 @@ static __init int add_rtc_cmos(void)
> >     }
> >  #endif
> >  
> > +   if (xen_pv_domain())
> > +           return -ENODEV;
> > +
> 
> Note there's a missing include that breaks !XEN builds.

What's the state of this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to