From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <[email protected]>

Commit fcc742eaad7c "ring-buffer: Add event descriptor to simplify passing
data" added a descriptor that holds various data instead of passing around
several variables through parameters. The problem was that one of the
parameters was modified in a function and the code was designed not to have
an effect on that modified  parameter. Now that the parameter is a
descriptor and any modifications to it are non-volatile, the size of the
data could be unnecessarily expanded.

Remove the extra space added if a timestamp was added and the event went
across the page.

Cc: [email protected] # 4.3+
Fixes: fcc742eaad7c "ring-buffer: Add event descriptor to simplify passing data"
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 4dd6d5bc4e11..9c6045a27ba3 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -2797,8 +2797,11 @@ rb_reserve_next_event(struct ring_buffer *buffer,
 
        event = __rb_reserve_next(cpu_buffer, &info);
 
-       if (unlikely(PTR_ERR(event) == -EAGAIN))
+       if (unlikely(PTR_ERR(event) == -EAGAIN)) {
+               if (info.add_timestamp)
+                       info.length -= RB_LEN_TIME_EXTEND;
                goto again;
+       }
 
        if (!event)
                goto out_fail;
-- 
2.6.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to