On 11/05, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 21:17:20 +0100 Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 11/05, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > > > Cough... and on the second thought this patch needs v2. Sorry Andrew, > > > please > > > drop > > > signal-kill-the-obsolete-signal_unkillable-check-in-complete_signal.patch > > > I'll send the updated version. > > > > > > With this patch the parent namespace can use any fatal signal (not only > > > SIGKILL) > > > to kill the init process in container. I do not think this is actually > > > bad, but > > > in any case this should not silently come as a side effect. And this is > > > not > > > consistent with SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE/sig_kernel_only() check in get_signal(). > > > > > > Most probably I will just resend this patch as 2/2, while 1/2 will change > > > sig_task_ignored() because afaics it is not actually right too (albeit not > > > really buggy). > > > > So this replaces > > signal-kill-the-obsolete-signal_unkillable-check-in-complete_signal.patch > > 2/3 is actually the same change, just the changelog was updated. > > It's awfully late. Do you see any reason why we should jam this into 4.4?
No, I think this can wait till 4.5. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
