On Fri, Oct 16, 2026 at 01:50:19PM +0530, Ishu Brar wrote: > The SM7250 ADSP uses the same PAS ID, crash reason SMEM item, SSR/sysmon > names and proxy power domains as the SM6350 one, so reuse its resource. > > Signed-off-by: Ishu Brar <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c > b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c > index 2e1e39826..365f4fa5b 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c > @@ -2046,6 +2046,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_pas_of_match[] = { > { .compatible = "qcom,sm6375-adsp-pas", .data = &sm6350_adsp_resource }, > { .compatible = "qcom,sm6375-cdsp-pas", .data = &sm8150_cdsp_resource }, > { .compatible = "qcom,sm6375-mpss-pas", .data = &sm6375_mpss_resource }, > + { .compatible = "qcom,sm7250-adsp-pas", .data = &sm6350_adsp_resource },
This actually suggests devices are compatible, so should be expressed with fallback and this is not necessary. Best regards, Krzysztof
