On October 14, 2026 10:46:02 PM PDT, Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]> wrote: >On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 7:21 AM Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Anyway, I don't know. I like this feature, and maybe it's going to be >> used so infrequently it's not a big deal, but feels clunky. > >Perhaps we could call it something shorter, like `__explicit_init` or >similar -- I don't see that substring (even without the double >underscores) used anywhere. That's nice, yeah. And it's not the first time we've changed the "spelling" of an attribute. Does anyone object to that? I can replace it with that in my tree... -Kees -- Kees Cook
- [PATCH 0/2] Add __require_explicit_initialization and i... Kees Cook
- [PATCH 2/2] seq_file: Require explicit initializat... Kees Cook
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] seq_file: Require explicit ini... Greg KH
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] seq_file: Require explicit... Miguel Ojeda
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] seq_file: Require expl... Kees Cook
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] seq_file: Require... Greg KH
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] seq_file: Req... Miguel Ojeda
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] seq_file:... Greg KH
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] seq_file:... Ian Rogers
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] seq_file:... Kees Cook
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] seq_file:... Nick Desaulniers
- [PATCH 1/2] Compiler Attributes: Add __require_exp... Kees Cook
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Compiler Attributes: Add __req... Nathan Chancellor
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Compiler Attributes: Add __req... Greg Kroah-Hartman

