Probably more for LIP rather than LIH, but still ..
srs
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [IP] Linus Torvalds Outburst Sparks Fierce Debate: Does Open
Source Software Need Specs?
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:12:42 -0400
From: David Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ip Ip <[email protected]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> TechNews wrote:
>
> "Linus Torvalds Outburst Sparks Fierce Debate: Does Open Source
> Software
> Need Specs?"
> SYS-CON (10/03/05)
>
> In a recent posting on the Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linus Torvalds
> blasted specs as a method for developing software, claiming they
> pay more
> attention to theory than reality and introduce a needless level of
> abstraction that often falls flat when put into practice. Torvalds
> cited
> the OSI network model protocols, which he characterized as "classic
> spec-design, which had absolutely zero relevance for the real
> world." He
> admitted that specs could serve as a useful framework for
> discussion, but
> that they should have no bearing on the actual design. Feedback to
> Torvalds' posting was varied, as some immediately took him to task,
> insisting that specs, like actual code, were by definition
> approximations,
> while others supported his view that their use is limited. One
> respondent
> noted that many original Unix specs were quite good, while later
> standards
> such as HTML and SOAP were well-written, but ultimately functioned
> poorly
> due to sloppy designs. One post criticized Torvalds for being too
> narrow
>
in
> his definition, claiming that his view of a spec as an unchanging
> template
> incapable of adapting throughout the development process is not
> held by
> anyone in the industry. Another reader claimed specs are essential to
> commercial projects, as they serve essentially as a contract,
> defining the
> scope and function of a given body of code. By way of mediation, one
> respondent sought to clarify Torvalds' position by arguing against the
> misconception that programs can be written through the progressive
>
revision
> of specifications, when really specs are useful insofar as they can
> guide
>
a
> discussion, but must yield to technical requirements as the
> development
> process unfolds.
>
>
>
>
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
