On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, David Chinner wrote:
> I don't think that gives the same return value. The return value
> is supposed to be clamped at a maximum of page_cache_size(mapping).
Ok. So this?
ext2: Simplify some functions
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/ext2/dir.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: mm/fs/ext2/dir.c
===================================================================
--- mm.orig/fs/ext2/dir.c 2007-11-28 20:13:07.387132777 -0800
+++ mm/fs/ext2/dir.c 2007-11-28 20:14:35.739632586 -0800
@@ -63,8 +63,7 @@ static inline void ext2_put_page(struct
static inline unsigned long dir_pages(struct inode *inode)
{
- return (inode->i_size+page_cache_size(inode->i_mapping)-1)>>
- page_cache_shift(inode->i_mapping);
+ return page_cache_next(inode->i_mapping, inode->i_size);
}
/*
@@ -77,7 +76,7 @@ ext2_last_byte(struct inode *inode, unsi
unsigned last_byte = inode->i_size;
struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
- last_byte -= page_nr << page_cache_shift(mapping);
+ last_byte -= page_cache_pos(mapping, page_nr, 0);
if (last_byte > page_cache_size(mapping))
last_byte = page_cache_size(mapping);
return last_byte;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
