On 2026-04-14 10:13:01, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 03:13:35PM +0200, Andrey Albershteyn wrote:
> > -   if (!fsverity_active(inode) && IS_VERITY(inode)) {
> > -           /*
> > -            * If this inode was not yet opened, the verity info hasn't been
> > -            * loaded yet, so we need to do that here to force it into 
> > memory.
> > -            */
> > -           filp = kernel_file_open(datapath, O_RDONLY, current_cred());
> > -           if (IS_ERR(filp))
> > -                   return PTR_ERR(filp);
> > -           fput(filp);
> > -   }
> > +   if (fsverity_active(inode))
> > +           fsverity_ensure_verity_info(inode);
> 
> fsverity_ensure_verity_info already is a no-op for !fsverity_active,
> so the check could be remove.

I don't think it is. For non-fsverity inodes it will try to call into
descriptor reading callback and fail.

> Also we should probably propagate the
> error return from fsverity_ensure_verity_info here.

oh right, thanks!

-- 
- Andrey



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to