On 11/8/18 at 1:05 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:

> Currently, efi_mem_reserve_persistent() may not be called from atomic
> context, since both the kmalloc() call and the memremap() call may
> sleep.
> 
> The kmalloc() call is easy enough to fix, but the memremap() call
> needs to be moved into an init hook since we cannot control the
> memory allocation behavior of memremap() at the call site.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> index 249eb70691b0..cfc876e0b67b 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> @@ -963,36 +963,43 @@ bool efi_is_table_address(unsigned long phys_addr)
>  }
>  
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(efi_mem_reserve_persistent_lock);
> +static struct linux_efi_memreserve *efi_memreserve_root __ro_after_init;
>  
>  int efi_mem_reserve_persistent(phys_addr_t addr, u64 size)
>  {
> -     struct linux_efi_memreserve *rsv, *parent;
> +     struct linux_efi_memreserve *rsv;
>  
> -     if (efi.mem_reserve == EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR)
> +     if (!efi_memreserve_root)
>               return -ENODEV;
>  
> -     rsv = kmalloc(sizeof(*rsv), GFP_KERNEL);
> +     rsv = kmalloc(sizeof(*rsv), GFP_ATOMIC);
>       if (!rsv)
>               return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -     parent = memremap(efi.mem_reserve, sizeof(*rsv), MEMREMAP_WB);
> -     if (!parent) {
> -             kfree(rsv);
> -             return -ENOMEM;
> -     }
> -
>       rsv->base = addr;
>       rsv->size = size;
>  
>       spin_lock(&efi_mem_reserve_persistent_lock);
> -     rsv->next = parent->next;
> -     parent->next = __pa(rsv);
> +     rsv->next = efi_memreserve_root->next;
> +     efi_memreserve_root->next = __pa(rsv);
>       spin_unlock(&efi_mem_reserve_persistent_lock);
>  
> -     memunmap(parent);
> +     return 0;
> +}
>  
> +static int __init efi_memreserve_root_init(void)
> +{
> +     if (efi.mem_reserve == EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR)
> +             return -ENODEV;
> +
> +     efi_memreserve_root = memremap(efi.mem_reserve,
> +                                    sizeof(*efi_memreserve_root),
> +                                    MEMREMAP_WB);
> +     if (!efi_memreserve_root)
> +             return -ENOMEM;
>       return 0;
>  }
> +early_initcall(efi_memreserve_root_init);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
>  static int update_efi_random_seed(struct notifier_block *nb,
> -- 
> 2.19.1
BTW, I won’t be able to apply this patch on top of this series [1]. After 
applied that series, the original BUG sleep from atomic is gone as well as two 
other GIC warnings. Do you think a new patch is needed here?

[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg685751.html

Reply via email to