On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 03:09:23PM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote: > >As i already wrote - SET_PARAMS is _NOT_ enough. Please try yourself. > >Unload/Load the module and simple issue a DVBFE_SET_PARAMS (NOT > >GET_INFO) and it doesnt tune/lock at least for STB0899 and it also > >complains in the dmesg with: > > > > stb0899_search: Unsupported delivery system 0 > > stb0899_read_status: Unsupported delivery system 0 > > stb0899_search: Unsupported delivery system 0 > > stb0899_read_status: Unsupported delivery system 0 > > stb0899_search: Unsupported delivery system 0 > > stb0899_read_status: Unsupported delivery system 0 > > > >although i set > > > > dvbfe_params.delivery=DVBFE_DELSYS_DVBS2; > > Yep, it isn't supposed to work that way with simply issuing SET_PARAMS.
Okay - So either
- remove the "delivery" in the dvbfe_params because it is unnecessary,
confusing and broken, and rename the GET_INFO call to SET_DELIVERY
or something which implies that its not a _GET_ call
or
- make SET_PARAMS the call to honor delivery in dvbfe_params and remove
the setting of the delivery of GET_INFO
I'd prefere the 2nd option because currently the usage and naming
is an incoherent mess which should better not get more adopters ..
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-171-2280134
Those who would give up a little freedom to get a little
security shall soon have neither - Benjamin Franklin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list [email protected] http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
