On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 02:46:29PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> +For this to work the .c file for each compilation unit will include both the
> +format headers and the generic code for the implementation. For instance in 
> an
> +implementation compilation unit the headers would normally be included as
> +follows::
> +
> +     #include <linux/generic_pt/common.h>
> +     #include "fmt/defs_amdv1.h"
> +     #include "pt_defs.h"
> +     #include "fmt/amdv1.h"
> +     #include "pt_common.h"
> +     #include "pt_iter.h"
> +     #include "IOMMUt_pt.h"  /* The IOMMU implementation */

Should the last one be "iommu_pt.h" that's mentioned below?

> +iommu_pt.h includes definitions that will generate the operations functions 
> for
> +map/unmap/etc. using the definitions provided by AMDv1. The resulting module
> +will have exported symbols named like pt_iommu_amdv1_init().
-----

> +Refer to drivers/iommu/generic-pt/fmt/iommu_template.h for an example of how 
> the
> +IOMMU implementation uses multi-compilation to generate per-format ops 
> structs
> +pointers.

It should be "generic_pt" in the path, instead of "generic-pt".

> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_iter.h 
> b/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_iter.h
> index 6bd84f96f5ad6e..0956c8a45646c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_iter.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_iter.h
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
>   * pt_check_range() - Validate the range can be iterated
>   * @range: Range to validate
>   *
> - * Check that va and last_va fall within the permitted range of VAs. If the
> + * Check that VA and last_va fall within the permitted range of VAs. If the
>   * format is using PT_FEAT_SIGN_EXTEND then this also checks the sign 
> extension
>   * is correct.
 
I suppose it should be squashed into the previous patch :)

Thanks
Nicolin

Reply via email to