On 15/07/2025 10.43, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Christoph suggested that the explicit _GPL_ can be dropped from the
> module namespace export macro, as it's intended for in-tree modules
> only. It would be possible to restrict it technically, but it was
> pointed out [2] that some cases of using an out-of-tree build of an
> in-tree module with the same name are legitimate. But in that case those
> also have to be GPL anyway so it's unnecessary to spell it out in the
> macro name.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [1]
> Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/cak7lnatrkzhwjgpojcnvdiaodnp%[email protected]/
> [2]
> Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Shivank Garg <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Schier <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Gomez <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
> ---
> Daniel, please clarify if you'll take this via module tree or Christian
> can take it via vfs tree?
Patch 707f853d7fa3 ("module: Provide EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FOR_MODULES() helper")
from Peter was merged through Masahiro in v6.16-rc1. Since this is a related
fix/rename/cleanup, it'd make sense for it to go through his kbuild tree as
well. Masahiro, please let me know if you'd prefer otherwise. If not, I'll queue
it up in the modules tree.
