On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 04:05:16PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > Christoph suggested that the explicit _GPL_ can be dropped from the > module namespace export macro, as it's intended for in-tree modules > only. It would be possible to resrict it technically, but it was pointed
s/resrict/restrict/ > out [2] that some cases of using an out-of-tree build of an in-tree > module with the same name are legitimate. But in that case those also > have to be GPL anyway so it's unnecessary to spell it out. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [1] > Link: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/cak7lnatrkzhwjgpojcnvdiaodnp%[email protected]/ > [2] > Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Shivank Garg <[email protected]> > Acked-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]> > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> > --- Looks good to me, thanks! Acked-by: Nicolas Schier <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
