James Bottomley <[email protected]> wrote: > But even if you don't accept that, Google keeps effective joint > ownership of the code through their CLA and so could grant a dual > licence to the kernel anyway without needing to refer to any > contributors.
Actually, the fact that BoringSSL's ML-DSA implementation uses C++ with heavy use of integer-parametered templating is more insurmountable for borrowing their code. Yes, it does allow them to reduce their LoC to ~3000 and is much more readable, but I can't do that in C. Now, if we want to work on persuading Linus to allow C++ into the kernel... David
