On Fri Jun 27, 2025 at 5:34 PM CEST, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 6/27/25 4:44 PM, Luca Weiss wrote:
>> On Fri Jun 27, 2025 at 4:34 PM CEST, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 6/27/25 1:33 PM, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>>> On Wed Jun 25, 2025 at 4:38 PM CEST, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>> On 6/25/25 11:23 AM, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>>>>> Add a devicetree for The Fairphone (Gen. 6) smartphone, which is based
>>>>>> on the SM7635 SoC.
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>> +&pm8550vs_d {
>>>>>> + status = "disabled";
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +&pm8550vs_e {
>>>>>> + status = "disabled";
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +&pm8550vs_g {
>>>>>> + status = "disabled";
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>
>>>>> Hm... perhaps we should disable these by deafult
>>>>
>>>> Do you want me to do this in this patchset, or we clean this up later at
>>>> some point? I'd prefer not adding even more dependencies to my patch
>>>> collection right now.
>>>
>>> I can totally hear that..
>>>
>>> Let's include it in this patchset, right before SoC addition
>>> I don't think there's any pm8550vs users trying to get merged in
>>> parallel so it should be OK
>>
>> Okay, can do. Disable all of them (_c, _d, _e, _g), and re-enable them
>> in current users? I assume there might also be boards that only have
>> e.g. _d and no _c.
>
> I suppose it's only fair to do so, in line with
>
> d37e2646c8a5 ("arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100-pmics: Enable all SMB2360
> separately")
Sounds good, I've prepared this change for v2.
>
>
>>>>>> +&usb_1 {
>>>>>> + dr_mode = "otg";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + /* USB 2.0 only */
>>>>>
>>>>> Because there's no usb3phy description yet, or due to hw design?
>>>>
>>>> HW design. Funnily enough with clk_ignore_unused this property is not
>>>> needed, and USB(2.0) works fine then. Just when (I assume) the USB3
>>>> clock is turned off which the bootloader has enabled, USB stops working.
>>>
>>> The USB controller has two possible clock sources: the PIPE_CLK that
>>> the QMPPHY outputs, or the UTMI clock (qcom,select-utmi-as-pipe-clk).
>>
>> So okay like this for you, for a USB2.0-only HW?
>
> Yeah, maybe change the comment to something like:
>
> /* USB 2.0 only (RX/TX lanes physically not routed) */
>
> to avoid getting this question asked again
Ack
/* USB 2.0 only, HW does not support USB 3.x */
Regards
Luca
>
>>> Because you said there's no USB3, I'm assuming DP-over-Type-C won't
>>> be a thing either? :(
>>
>> Yep. I'd have preferred USB3+DP as well since it's actually quite cool
>> to have with proper Linux. On Android, at least on older versions it's
>> barely usable imo. Can't even properly watch videos on the big screen
>> with that SW stack.
>
> Bummer! Not something we can change though :(
>
> Konrad
