[...] > Blaise started this most recent effort by attempting to address the > concerns brought up in previous efforts, you and others rejected this > first attempt and directed Blaise towards a light skeleton and LSM > based approach, which is where he is at with Hornet. Once again, you > reject this approach with minimal guidance on what would be > acceptable, and our response is to ask for clarification on your > preferred design. We're not asking for a full working solution, > simply a couple of paragraphs outlining the design with enough detail > to put forward a working solution that isn't immediately NACK'd. > We've made this request multiple times in the past, most recently this > past weekend, where KP replied that he would be "happy" to share
Here's the proposed design: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CACYkzJ6VQUExfyt0=-FmXz46GHJh3d=fxh5j4kfexcefbhv...@mail.gmail.com/#t > designs/code. Unfortunately, since then all we've received from > either you or KP since then has been effectively just a list of your > objections on repeat; surely typing out a couple of paragraphs > outlining a design would have been quicker, easier, and more > constructive then your latest reply?
