Hi Hongbo,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on crypto/master]
[also build test ERROR on security/next-testing linus/master v5.12-rc6 
next-20210406]
[cannot apply to cryptodev/master]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Hongbo-Li/crypto-add-rsa-pss-support-for-x509/20210406-211503
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/crypto-2.6.git 
master
config: alpha-randconfig-p001-20210406 (attached as .config)
compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget 
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O 
~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # 
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/5aa0c74e8d4a650e359aec1790c35c2c26fb618f
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review 
Hongbo-Li/crypto-add-rsa-pss-support-for-x509/20210406-211503
        git checkout 5aa0c74e8d4a650e359aec1790c35c2c26fb618f
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross 
ARCH=alpha 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> make[3]: *** No rule to make target 
>> 'crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_rsapss_params.asn1.c', needed by 
>> 'crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_rsapss_params.asn1.o'.
   make[3]: *** No rule to make target 
'crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_rsapss_params.asn1.h', needed by 
'crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_rsapss_params.asn1.o'.
   make[3]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-...@lists.01.org

Attachment: .config.gz
Description: application/gzip

Reply via email to