Em seg., 22 de fev. de 2021 às 17:26, Stefan Berger <stef...@linux.ibm.com> escreveu: > > On 2/22/21 12:58 PM, Saulo Alessandre wrote: > > From: Saulo Alessandre <saulo.alessan...@tse.jus.br> > > > > * crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c > > - prepare x509 parser to load nist_secp384r1 > > > > * crypto/ecc_curve_defs.h > > - add nist_p384 params > > > > * include/crypto/ecdh.h > > - add ECC_CURVE_NIST_P384 > > > > * include/linux/oid_registry.h > > - reorder OID_id_ecdsa_with_sha1 > > - add OID_id_secp384r1 > > > > Signed-off-by: Saulo Alessandre <saulo.alessan...@tse.jus.br> > > I would separate this patch into an x509: and certs: part since it > touches two subsystems. > > I can take this series of patches and post my v9 including them at the > end. This would make it easier for others to test. I would massage them > a bit, including the separation of the 1st patch into 2 patches, if you > don't mind, preserving your Signed-off-by. I need to fix something in my > v8 regarding registration failure handling. Let me know whether this is > fine with you.
For me it's ok. > > I had tested your patches over the weekend with my endless test tool > creating keys in user space and loading them into the kernel. It worked > fine for NIST p256 & p384. Also signing kernel modules with NIST p384 is > working fine. > > So, for the series: > > Tested-by: Stefan Berger <stef...@linux.ibm.com> > > Regards, > > Stefan > > Regards -- []'s ----- Saulo Alessandre <saulo.alessan...@gmail.com>
