On 2020/5/25 15:36, Markus Elfring wrote:
>> Could you help me to make the sentence better?
> 
> How do you think about a wording variant like the following?
> 
>   So the system will crash when this memory will be used again.
> 
Uh, it's much better, thanks.

> 
>>> * You proposed to move a call of the function 
>>> “crypto_finalize_skcipher_request”.
>>>   How does this change fit to the mentioned position?
>>>
>> The resources which need to be freed is not used anymore, but the pointers
>> of these resources may be changed in the function
>> "crypto_finalize_skcipher_request", so free these resources before call the
>> function is suitable.
> 
> Another alternative:
>   The resources which need to be cleaned up are not used any more.
>   But the pointers of these resources may be changed in the
>   function “crypto_finalize_skcipher_request”.
>   Thus release specific resources before calling this function.
> 
Oh great! Thanks.

> Regards,
> Markus
> 

-- 
---
Regards,
Longpeng(Mike)
  • Re: [PATCH 2/2... Markus Elfring
    • Re: [PATC... Longpeng (Mike, Cloud Infrastructure Service Product Dept.)
      • Re: [... Markus Elfring
        • R... Longpeng (Mike, Cloud Infrastructure Service Product Dept.)

Reply via email to