On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 07:33:30PM +0000, Pascal Van Leeuwen wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: linux-crypto-ow...@vger.kernel.org > > <linux-crypto-ow...@vger.kernel.org> On Behalf Of Eric Biggers > > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 6:23 PM > > To: Pascal Van Leeuwen <pvanleeu...@verimatrix.com> > > Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org; Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au>; > > David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net> > > Subject: Re: generic ahash question > > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 02:41:03PM +0000, Pascal Van Leeuwen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I recall reading somewhere in the Linux Crypto documentation that support > > > for finup() and digest() > > > calls were explicitly added to support hardware that couldn't handle > > > seperate init/update/final > > > calls so they could at least be used with e.g. the IPsec stack. I also > > > noticed that testmgr *does* > > > attempt to verify these seperate calls ... > > > > > > So I'm guessing there must be some flags that I can set to indicate I'm > > > not supporting seperate > > > init/update/final calls so that testmgr skips those specific tests? Which > > > flag(s) do I need to set? > > > > > > > Where does the documentation say that? > > For finup: > "As some hardware cannot do update and final separately, this callback was > added to allow such > hardware to be used at least by IPsec" > > For digest: > "Just like finup, this was added for hardware which cannot do even the finup, > but can only do the > whole transformation in one run." > > Those statement sort of imply (to me) that it's OK to only support digest or > only finup and digest. >
Can you send a patch to fix this documentation? - Eric
