On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 11:06 AM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulni...@google.com> wrote: > In fact, looking closer at that diff, the section in question > previously had 32b alignment. Eric, was that change intentional? It > seems funny to have a 32b entity size but a 16b alignment.
32B & 16B -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers
