From: Eric Biggers <ebigg...@google.com>
In gcm_hash_len(), use be128 rather than u128. This fixes the following
sparse warnings:
crypto/gcm.c:252:19: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base
types)
crypto/gcm.c:252:19: expected unsigned long long [usertype] a
crypto/gcm.c:252:19: got restricted __be64 [usertype]
crypto/gcm.c:253:19: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base
types)
crypto/gcm.c:253:19: expected unsigned long long [usertype] b
crypto/gcm.c:253:19: got restricted __be64 [usertype]
No actual change in behavior.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebigg...@google.com>
---
crypto/gcm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/crypto/gcm.c b/crypto/gcm.c
index e438492db2ca2..bbce31f6199ba 100644
--- a/crypto/gcm.c
+++ b/crypto/gcm.c
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ static int gcm_hash_len(struct aead_request *req, u32 flags)
struct crypto_gcm_req_priv_ctx *pctx = crypto_gcm_reqctx(req);
struct ahash_request *ahreq = &pctx->u.ahreq;
struct crypto_gcm_ghash_ctx *gctx = &pctx->ghash_ctx;
- u128 lengths;
+ be128 lengths;
lengths.a = cpu_to_be64(req->assoclen * 8);
lengths.b = cpu_to_be64(gctx->cryptlen * 8);
--
2.20.1.97.g81188d93c3-goog
