On 28 September 2018 at 17:49, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 25 September 2018 at 16:56, Jason A. Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com> wrote: >> These NEON and non-NEON implementations come from Andy Polyakov's >> implementation, and are included here in raw form without modification, >> so that subsequent commits that fix these up for the kernel can see how >> it has changed. This awkward commit splitting has been requested for the >> ARM[64] implementations in particular. >> >> While this is CRYPTOGAMS code, the originating code for this happens to >> be the same as OpenSSL's commit 87cc649f30aaf69b351701875b9dac07c29ce8a2 >> >> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com> >> Based-on-code-from: Andy Polyakov <ap...@openssl.org> >> Cc: Samuel Neves <sne...@dei.uc.pt> >> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org> >> Cc: Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> >> Cc: Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumas...@gmail.com> >> Cc: Andy Polyakov <ap...@openssl.org> >> Cc: Russell King <li...@armlinux.org.uk> >> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > > As I mentioned before, I'd prefer this to be based on the original .pl > but if I am the only one objecting to this, I guess I can live with > it. >
Note that I am getting bounces from LAKML because the patch is too big.
