Hi Andy, On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 5:01 PM Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote: > I think Ard’s point is valid: in the long run we don’t want two competing > software implementations of each primitive. It clearly *should* be possible > to make crypto API call into zinc for synchronous software operations, but a > demonstration of how this actually works and that there isn’t some change to > zinc to make it would well would be in order, I think. > > IMO the right approach is do one conversion right away and save the rest for > later.
Alright, I'll go ahead and do this for v4. Thanks for the guidance. Jason
