On 7/4/2018 11:32 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > It means it would be invariant to LE BE accessors, right? > > lo-hi: LE (0x0 0x4) BE (0x4 0x0) > hi-lo: LE (0x4 0x0) BE (0x0 0x4)
Ok, well, given that this is what I implemented originally and the argument seems a little bike-sheddy. I vote we just leave the current patch as is. Logan
