On 7/4/2018 11:32 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> It means it would be invariant to LE BE accessors, right?
> 
> lo-hi: LE (0x0 0x4) BE (0x4 0x0)
> hi-lo: LE (0x4 0x0) BE (0x0 0x4)


Ok, well, given that this is what I implemented originally and the
argument seems a little bike-sheddy. I vote we just leave the current
patch as is.

Logan

Reply via email to