On 11/06/2017 04:30 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
From: Eric Biggers <ebigg...@google.com>

Neither 'p' nor 'g' can be NULL, as they were unpacked using
crypto_dh_decode_key().  And it makes no sense for them to be optional.
So remove the NULL checks that were copy-and-pasted into both modules.


Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.amba...@microchip.com>

Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebigg...@google.com>
---
  crypto/dh.c                                   | 3 ---
  drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_asym_algs.c | 3 ---
  2 files changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/crypto/dh.c b/crypto/dh.c
index aadaf36fb56f..5659fe7f446d 100644
--- a/crypto/dh.c
+++ b/crypto/dh.c
@@ -53,9 +53,6 @@ static int dh_check_params_length(unsigned int p_len)
static int dh_set_params(struct dh_ctx *ctx, struct dh *params)
  {
-       if (unlikely(!params->p || !params->g))
-               return -EINVAL;
-
        if (dh_check_params_length(params->p_size << 3))
                return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_asym_algs.c b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_asym_algs.c
index 7655fdb499de..13c52d6bf630 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_asym_algs.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_asym_algs.c
@@ -443,9 +443,6 @@ static int qat_dh_set_params(struct qat_dh_ctx *ctx, struct 
dh *params)
        struct qat_crypto_instance *inst = ctx->inst;
        struct device *dev = &GET_DEV(inst->accel_dev);
- if (unlikely(!params->p || !params->g))
-               return -EINVAL;
-
        if (qat_dh_check_params_length(params->p_size << 3))
                return -EINVAL;

Reply via email to