* Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > So if this observation of mine is true we could go back to the old code for
> > the
> > hotpath, but use RDI for TBL and not reload it in the hotpath.
>
> Thanks for the excellent breakdown.
>
> When I looked at the patch again, I came to the same conclusion as your
> #4, which is that RDI isn't being used in the inner loops. It *is* used
> in the outermost loop, however.
>
> So v2 of my sha512-avx2-asm.S patch spilled CTX onto the stack, instead
> of TBL:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170913223303.pskmy2v7nto6rvtg@treble
Indeed - I should have checked your v2 patch, but somehow missed it. Would have
saved me some looking+typing ;-)
Thanks,
Ingo
