The INTMASK_REG register does not exist on EIP76. Due to this, the call:
omap_rng_write(priv, RNG_INTMASK_REG, RNG_SHUTDOWN_OFLO_MASK);
ends up, through the reg_map_eip76[] array, in accessing the register at
offset 0, which is the RNG_OUTPUT_0_REG. This by itself doesn't cause
any problem, but clearly doesn't enable the interrupt as it was
expected.
On EIP76, the register that allows to enable the interrupt is
RNG_CONTROL_REG. And just like RNG_INTMASK_REG, it's bit 1 of this
register that allows to enable the shutdown_oflo interrupt.
Fixes: 383212425c926 ("hwrng: omap - Add device variant for SafeXcel IP-76
found in Armada 8K")
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]>
---
drivers/char/hw_random/omap-rng.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/omap-rng.c
b/drivers/char/hw_random/omap-rng.c
index d286628..b1ad125 100644
--- a/drivers/char/hw_random/omap-rng.c
+++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/omap-rng.c
@@ -408,7 +408,18 @@ static int of_get_omap_rng_device_details(struct
omap_rng_dev *priv,
"err = %d\n", err);
}
- omap_rng_write(priv, RNG_INTMASK_REG, RNG_SHUTDOWN_OFLO_MASK);
+ /*
+ * On OMAP4, enabling the shutdown_oflo interrupt is
+ * done in the interrupt mask register. There is no
+ * such register on EIP76, and it's enabled by the
+ * same bit in the control register
+ */
+ if (priv->pdata->regs[RNG_INTMASK_REG])
+ omap_rng_write(priv, RNG_INTMASK_REG,
+ RNG_SHUTDOWN_OFLO_MASK);
+ else
+ omap_rng_write(priv, RNG_CONTROL_REG,
+ RNG_SHUTDOWN_OFLO_MASK);
}
return 0;
}
--
2.7.4
