Russell King - ARM Linux <li...@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> Testing that code on 4.8-rc (and 4.7 fwiw) gives:
>
> socket(PF_ALG, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0) = 3
> bind(3, {sa_family=AF_ALG, sa_data="hash\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"}, 88) = 0
> accept(3, 0, NULL) = 4
> write(4, "abc", 3) = -1 ENOKEY (Required key not
> available)
> read(4, 0xbec50508, 20) = -1 ENOKEY (Required key not
> available)
>
> IOW, the same problem - and it seems not to be a recent regression.
>
> Since the last time I tested CESA or CAAM was back in 4.4 times,
> it's got to be something between 4.4 and 4.7.
>
> Looking at the history, my guess would be the setkey changes -
> crypto: algif_skcipher - Require setkey before accept(2)
> crypto: af_alg - Disallow bind/setkey/... after accept(2)
> crypto: af_alg - Add nokey compatibility path
> crypto: hash - Add crypto_ahash_has_setkey
> crypto: algif_hash - Require setkey before accept(2)
This is definitely supposed to work. Basically if the algorithm
requires a key (e.g., HMAC) then you must set it. Otherwise it
should never return ENOKEY.
Which algorithm were you testing and what does /proc/crypto say?
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
