* Tim Chen <tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 10:05 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 06/29/16 07:42, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > and | behave basically the same here but || is intended.  It causes a
> > > static checker warning to mix up bitwise and logical operations.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/sha256-mb/sha256_mb.c 
> > > b/arch/x86/crypto/sha256-mb/sha256_mb.c
> > > index c9d5dcc..4ec895a 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/crypto/sha256-mb/sha256_mb.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/crypto/sha256-mb/sha256_mb.c
> > > @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static struct sha256_hash_ctx 
> > > *sha256_ctx_mgr_submit(struct sha256_ctx_mgr *mgr,
> > >    * Or if the user's buffer contains less than a whole block,
> > >    * append as much as possible to the extra block.
> > >    */
> > > - if ((ctx->partial_block_buffer_length) | (len < SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE)) {
> > > + if ((ctx->partial_block_buffer_length) || (len < SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE)) {
> > >           /* Compute how many bytes to copy from user buffer into
> > >            * extra block
> > >            */
> > > 
> > As far as I know the | was an intentional optimization, so you may way
> > to look at the generated code.
> > 
> >     -hpa
> > 
> 
> Yes, this is an intentional optimization. [...]

Please don't do intentional optimizations while mixing them with a very ugly 
coding style:

        if ((ctx->partial_block_buffer_length) | (len < SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE)) {

The extra, unnecessary parantheses around ctx->partial_block_buffer_length will 
make the ordinary reader assume that the person who wrote the code was unsure 
about basic C syntax details and typoed the '|' as well ...

Also, for heaven's (and readability's) sake, pick shorter structure field 
names. 
What's wrong with ctx->partial_block_buf_len?

Also, even if the '|' was intentional - wouldn't it result in better code to 
use 
'||'?

Plus:

> > >           /* Compute how many bytes to copy from user buffer into
> > >            * extra block
> > >            */

please use the customary (multi-line) comment style:

  /*
   * Comment .....
   * ...... goes here.
   */

specified in Documentation/CodingStyle.

Thanks,

        Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to