Hey Russell,

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 05:23:40PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> Rather than determining whether we're using a MD5 hash by looking at
> the digest size, switch to a cleaner solution using a per-request flag
> initialised by the method type.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk>
> ---
>  drivers/crypto/marvell/cesa.h |  1 +
>  drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c | 17 +++++++++--------
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
...
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c b/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
> index f59faabcd34f..aa12274608ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
> @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ static int mv_cesa_ahash_process(struct 
> crypto_async_request *req, u32 status)
>                * Hardware's MD5 digest is in little endian format, but
>                * SHA in big endian format
>                */
> -             if (digsize == MD5_DIGEST_SIZE) {
> +             if (creq->algo_le) {
>                       __le32 *result = (void *)ahashreq->result;
>  
>                       for (i = 0; i < digsize / 4; i++)
> @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static const struct mv_cesa_req_ops mv_cesa_ahash_req_ops 
> = {
>  };
>  
>  static int mv_cesa_ahash_init(struct ahash_request *req,
> -                           struct mv_cesa_op_ctx *tmpl)
> +                           struct mv_cesa_op_ctx *tmpl, bool algo_le)

nit: Would it make more sense the do bool algo_endian, and then ...

> @@ -861,7 +862,7 @@ static int mv_cesa_md5_init(struct ahash_request *req)
>  
>       mv_cesa_set_op_cfg(&tmpl, CESA_SA_DESC_CFG_MACM_MD5);
>  
> -     mv_cesa_ahash_init(req, &tmpl);
> +     mv_cesa_ahash_init(req, &tmpl, true);

        mv_cesa_ahash_init(req, &tmpl, ALGO_ENDIAN_LITTLE);

'true' doesn't seem as obvious.  But again, nit-picky.

thx,

Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to