On 08/13/2015 11:26 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:14:11PM -0700, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
>>
>> Right, but we don't need that anymore.
>
> Why not? If you reduce the size without moving the buffer wouldn't
> it begin with a bunch of zeroes and wouldn't you lose the real bytes
> at the end?
>
If you don't like the first option then we still need this, as you pointed out.
---8<---
Change memcpy to memmove because the copy is done within the same buffer.
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_asym_algs.c
b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_asym_algs.c
index fe352a6..e87f510 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_asym_algs.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_asym_algs.c
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static void qat_rsa_cb(struct icp_qat_fw_pke_resp *resp)
}
if (areq->dst_len != req->ctx->key_sz)
- memcpy(areq->dst, ptr, areq->dst_len);
+ memmove(areq->dst, ptr, areq->dst_len);
akcipher_request_complete(areq, err);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
