On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 08:26:51AM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote: > > What about to use a fallback algorithm that does not need to touch > FPU/SIMD in such cases? We would not need cryptd at all and it would > keep the requests in the right order because we don't defer them.
This would be bad for throughput since the fallback is many orders of magnitude slower than aesni. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
