On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 02:45:33PM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote: > Am Freitag, 20. Juni 2014, 23:24:18 schrieb kbuild test robot: > > Hi, > > first of all, thanks for the information. As you have seen, I created a patch > covering your comments on the NULL pointer handling. > > > > The kernel also provides standard linked list features and you should > > consider using those instead of rolling your own. > > There is a reason for this approach: the very same code (with exception of > the > interface code part) is also available for libgcrypt -- see [1] and gcrypt- > devel. I did not want to have different code, because any bug fix relevant to > the one implementation is also important to the other. Thus, I feel that it > is > beneficial to use the linked list feature as implemented in the current DRBG. > > [1] http://www.chronox.de/drbg.html
This is unacceptable. We are not going to add crap to the kernel just because the same crap exists elsewhere. Please fix this or I will be reverting your patches. Thanks, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
