On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 01:54:15PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 10:44 PM, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote:
> >Em 26-11-2013 17:27, Daniel Borkmann escreveu:
> >>On 11/26/2013 01:00 AM, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote:
> >>>Compile-tested on x86_64.
> >>
> >>Actually with yet another version, I hoped that the "compile-tested"-only
> >>statement would eventually disappear, ohh well. ;)
> >
> >I did compile test each version ;-) including verifying (with "make 
> >crypto/memneq.i") that the macro was really generating the expected inline 
> >assembly (with these #ifdef chains, one has to be careful with typos).
> >
> >(Actually, I compile tested with "make crypto/memneq.o crypto/memneq.s 
> >crypto/memneq.i". I took a peek at the assembly to see if it made sense.)
> >
> >>Resolving the OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR() macro for others than GCC jnto a
> >>barrier() seems a bit suboptimal, but assuming 99% of people will use
> >>GCC anyway, then for the minority of the remaining, they will worst case
> >>have a clever compiler and eventually mimic memcmp() in some situations,
> >>or have a not-so-clever compiler and execute the full code as is.
> >
> >I do not think any compiler other than gcc and icc can compile unmodified 
> >upstream kernel code. LLVM's clang would be the one which comes closest, but 
> >it has gcc-compatible inline assembly, as does icc AFAIK.
> >
> >The #define to barrier() within compiler-intel.h is for some compiler called 
> >ECC (not icc). From what I could find about it on a quick search, it appears 
> >to be some kind of Itanium compiler.
> >
> >That part of the header was added back in 2003, and I do not believe it is 
> >still relevant. A comment within that #ifdef block says "Intel ECC compiler 
> >doesn't support gcc specific asm stmts", but there are many uses of 
> >unprotected inline assembly all over the kernel (including on the ia64 
> >headers), so if that comment is true, the kernel will not compile with that 
> >compiler. It is probably a piece of leftover dead code. I only added to it 
> >because I am following RELOC_HIDE's example, and RELOC_HIDE is there.
> 
> Yep.
> 
> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dbork...@redhat.com>

Patch applied.  Thanks!
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to