If you build https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/network/connman/connman/+/0.80/tools/alg-test.c from the connman source code and compare the output to coreutils sha1sum you can see the problem.
shawn@debian-T61:~/git/test$ make connman_afalg cc connman_afalg.c -o connman_afalg shawn@debian-T61:~/git/test$ ./connman_afalg /bin/true send 27080 bytes recv 20 bytes 45384483cf9cd0d82eba164131795b4807c6d39d /bin/true shawn@debian-T61:~/git/test$ sha1sum /bin/true 82667ba2ec681d8e55b0ee3b6db2970f9911680d /bin/true On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Shawn Landden <shawnland...@gmail.com> wrote: > heres a version of the test case that builds..... > > Sorry about that. > > On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Shawn Landden <shawnland...@gmail.com> wrote: >> If I use sendfile() to send to a accept()ed AF_ALG socket set up for >> "hash", I get the wrong >> answer, if I read() and then write() I get the right answer. None of >> the system calls return an error. >> >> test case attached. >> >> -- >> >> --- >> Shawn Landden >> +1 360 389 3001 (SMS preferred) > > > > -- > > --- > Shawn Landden > +1 360 389 3001 (SMS preferred) -- --- Shawn Landden +1 360 389 3001 (SMS preferred) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
