On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Locktyukhin, Maxim <maxim.locktyuk...@intel.com> wrote:
> 20 (and more) cycles per byte shown below are not reasonable numbers for SHA-1 > - ~6 c/b (as can be seen in some of the results for Core2) is the expected > results ... Ten years ago, on Pentium II, one benchmark showed 13 cycles/byte for SHA-1. http://www.freeswan.org/freeswan_trees/freeswan-2.06/doc/performance.html#perf.estimate -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
