On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 04:32:59PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:02:55AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> >
> > >@@ -1480,7 +1480,7 @@ static int alg_test_cprng(const struct alg_test_desc
> > >*desc, const char *driver,
> > > /* Please keep this list sorted by algorithm name. */
> > > static const struct alg_test_desc alg_test_descs[] = {
> > > {
> > >- .alg = "ansi_cprng",
> > >+ .alg = "stdrng",
> > > .test = alg_test_cprng,
> > > .fips_allowed = 1,
> > > .suite = {
> >
> > Don't you use this vector for _all_ stdrngs now? krng for instance will
> > fail.
>
> Good cath!
>
Indeed, I didn't even think of that.
> What this really should do is test a specific implementation of
> stdrng. Like this,
>
Yeah, that looks right
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhor...@tuxdriver.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
